Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/10/2020
C. P. v. Mittelbach
Citations
- 304 Or. App. 569
- 468 P.3d 496
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reason- able apprehension existed where conduct continued despite police warnings and presence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-26· cited 185×
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-16· cited 82×
- Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 39×
- Reitz v. ErazoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-14· cited 27×
- Christensen v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-20· cited 23×
- Braude v. BraudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-16· cited 19×
- King v. W. T. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-18· cited 19×
- State v. GustafsonOregon Supreme Court· 1967-10-04· cited 14×
- Blastic v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-29· cited 12×
- Sparks v. DevenyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 9×
- Huber v. LandoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-24· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.