Weatherly v. Wilkie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that contacts might appear innocuous when viewed in isolation but, when viewed in context, may take on a different character
• noting that, in some cases, ostensibly innocuous contacts may take on a more ominous meaning when viewed against the backdrop of the parties’ history
• declining to consider evidence of contacts when there was no evidence in the record connecting those contacts to the respondent
• declining, in SPO case, to reach potential Rangel issues when concluding that the requirements of ORS 30.866 were not satisfied in any event
• considering contacts within their wider context and noting that contacts that might appear innocuous when viewed in isolation often take on a different character in context
• context of the parties’ history may give contacts “added import or ominous meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).