Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bankruptcy courts may, with the parties’ knowing and voluntary consent, adjudicate Stem claims — ie., statutorily core but constitutionally non-core proceedings
• holding that in a non-core proceeding, a bankruptcy court may enter final orders “with the consent of all the parties to the proceeding”
• holding that in a non-core proceeding, a bankruptcy court may enter final orders “with the consent of all the parties to the proceeding.”
• holding that in a non-core proceeding, a bankruptcy court may enter final orders “with the consent of all the parties to the proceeding”
• holding that in a non-core proceeding, a bankruptcy court may enter final orders “with the consent of all the parties to the proceeding”
• holding that Article III of the Constitution “is not violated when the parties knowingly and voluntarily consent to adjudication by a bankruptcy judge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).