Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/26/2019
Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. Schmidt
Citations
- 440 P.3d 461
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding section 1 \sets forth rights that are broader than and distinct from the rights in the Fourteenth Amendment\
- recognizing § 18 as \a due process provision\
- independently interpreting section 1 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights in manner different from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
- section 1 protects right to decide whether to continue pregnancy
- finding a fundamental and natural right to terminate a pregnancy
- discussing territorial and early state statutes criminalizing abortion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Biles, Stegall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Adoption of Baby Girl G.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-07-10· cited 92×
- Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-06-14· cited 74×
- State v. AlbanoSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-05-28· cited 63×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-01-21· cited 19×
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-01-10· cited 19×
- EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Eric FriedlanderSixth Circuit· 2020-06-02· cited 18×
- OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMONDSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2023-03-21· cited 17×
- State v. KemmerlySupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-07-26· cited 13×
- In re M.F.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-11-06· cited 12×
- Wrigley v. RomanickNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-03-16· cited 12×
- In re A.B.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2021-04-02· cited 10×
- Tillman v. GoodpastureSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-04-30· cited 10×
- State v. FlackSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-01-19· cited 9×
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2021-06-11· cited 8×
- Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. StanekSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-07-05· cited 8×
- Okla. Coal. for Reprod. Justice v. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2019-04-30· cited 7×
- State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2021-01-29· cited 5×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-02-14· cited 4×
- Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. KobachSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-07-05· cited 3×
- Josh Kaul v. Joel Urmanski, as DA for Sheboygan County, WIWisconsin Supreme Court· 2025-07-02· cited 3×
Cites
161 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1954-05-17· cited 3,819×
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 3,789×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 3,119×
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court· 1982-09-09· cited 2,739×
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,492×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 2,156×
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,147×
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 2,024×
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,929×
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 1,851×
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court· 1973-02-26· cited 1,432×
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,427×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
Other cases named Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. Schmidt
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.