Solomon v. Pathe Communications Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while Court of Chancery Rule 23.1 requires pleading facts with particularity in a derivative action, “the standard used to review a Chancery Rule 12(b)(6
• explaining how “the truthfulness of all well-pleaded allegations in the complaint is to be assumed”
• controlling stockholder “not required to give up legal rights that it clearly possesses.”
• “[C]onclusions . . . will not be accepted as true without specific allegations of fact to support them.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[C]onclusions [in a complaint] will not be accepted as true without specific allegations of fact to support them.”
• “As a general rule, jurisdictional matters should be decided before substantive matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).