Skip to main content
· 12/18/1998

Malone v. Brincat

Citations

  • 722 A.2d 5
  • 1998 Del. LEXIS 495
  • 1998 WL 919123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that directors owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty when they disseminate information to stockholders even when stockholder approval is not sought or required
  • holding federal securities law claim does not preclude state derivative suit for breach of fiduciary duty from the same false communications to stockholders
  • holding federal securities law claim does not preclude state derivative suit for breach of fiduciary duty from the same false communications to stockholders
  • explaining that a plaintiff must plead facts showing that a director “knowingly disseminat[ed] materially false information” and was “deliberately misinforming shareholders”
  • explaining that an action for a disclosure violation does not concern reliance, causation, or quantifiable damages but rather includes “a connection to the request for shareholder action”
  • explaining that a disclosure violation must be made “in bad faith, knowingly or intentionally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Hartnett, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.