Vanderbilt Income & Growth Associates, L.L.C. v. Arvida/JMB Managers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that tender offeror and assignee of LP interest could not satisfy Section 17-1002
• holding that the trial court may consider documents submitted by the defendant on a motion to dismiss solely for a non-hearsay purpose and therefore may not rely on factual assertions in the documents for the truth of the matter asserted
• noting that the Court may consider documents “integral to a plaintiff’s claim and incorporated into the complaint” when considering a motion to dismiss
• noting that the Court may consider documents “integral to a plaintiff’s claim and incorporated into the complaint” when deciding a motion to dismiss
• noting that the Court may consider documents “integral to a plaintiff’s claim and incorporated into the complaint” when deciding a motion to dismiss
• explaining that the court may consider documents outside of the pleadings “when the document is not being relied upon to prove the truth of its contents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).