Softsolutions, Inc. v. Brigham Young University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the market-rate approach because it would award the salaried attorney's employer a windfall profit; holding that cost-plus rate which included calculation of overhead expenses was the more reasonable measure of attorney fees for in-house counsel
• “[W]e are persuaded by the ample authority from other jurisdictions that a successful litigant who is not primarily engaged in providing legal services may recover attorney fees when represented by salaried in-house counsel.”
• collecting federal and state cases
• collecting federal and state cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).