Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating modern trend is to award attorney fees for in-house counsel based on the \market rate\
• stating attorney fees should be permitted to in-house counsel of nonlegal organization so long as counsel actively participated in matter
• instructing district court on remand to examine the A modern trend @ toward calculating fees based on the market rate to predict Washington law
• instructing district court on remand to examine the “modern trend” toward calculating fees based on the market rate to predict Washington law
• instructing district court on remand to examine the “modern trend” toward calculating fees based on the market rate to predict Washington law
• “Of course, if in-house counsel are not 11 actively participating (e.g., acting only as liaison), fees should not be awarded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).