Skip to main content
· 8/8/2011

ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Biamp Systems

Citations

  • 653 F.3d 1163
  • 80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 39
  • 99 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1809
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16339
  • 2011 WL 3437796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issues are waived when raised for the first time in objecting to a magistrate judge’s recommendation
  • concluding that interpretation of patent law fee-shifting provision \provides persuasive guidance\ in interpreting the attorney's fee provision of Utah's Uniform Trade Secrets Act
  • holding that issues are waived when raised for the first time in objecting to a magistrate judge’s proposed disposition
  • explaining that when the plaintiff prevails at trial, the defendant may not “appeal from the pretrial denial of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss”
  • stating that “[i]ssues raised for the first time in objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation are deemed waived” (alteration in original) (quoting Marshall v. Chater, 75 F.3d 1421, 1426–27 (10th Cir. 1996)) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • finding “Biamp was able to cure some, if not all, of the prejudice it may have suffered” by deposing the opponent’s expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Holloway, Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.