· 8/8/2011
ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Biamp Systems
Citations
- 653 F.3d 1163
- 80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 39
- 99 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1809
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16339
- 2011 WL 3437796
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that issues are waived when raised for the first time in objecting to a magistrate judge’s recommendation
- concluding that interpretation of patent law fee-shifting provision \provides persuasive guidance\ in interpreting the attorney's fee provision of Utah's Uniform Trade Secrets Act
- holding that issues are waived when raised for the first time in objecting to a magistrate judge’s proposed disposition
- explaining that when the plaintiff prevails at trial, the defendant may not “appeal from the pretrial denial of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss”
- stating that “[i]ssues raised for the first time in objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation are deemed waived” (alteration in original) (quoting Marshall v. Chater, 75 F.3d 1421, 1426–27 (10th Cir. 1996)) (internal quotation marks omitted)
- finding “Biamp was able to cure some, if not all, of the prejudice it may have suffered” by deposing the opponent’s expert
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Holloway, Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.