· 3/30/2001
McCoy v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Utah
Citations
- 2001 UT 31
- 20 P.3d 901
- 418 Utah Adv. Rep. 19
- 2001 Utah LEXIS 56
- 2001 WL 305157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the threshold inquiry for determining whether arbitration should be enforced is direct and specific evidence of an agreement between the parties
- affirming the denial of a motion to compel arbitration because “Blue Cross’s evidence failed to meet the minimum threshold of specificity” required under the Utah Arbitration Act to show Blue Cross provided notice of a later-added arbitration provision
- “Where the evidence relating to a purported agreement to arbitrate is undisputed, the district court has no discretion under the statute. It must compel arbitration.”
- setting forth a “direct and specific” evidence rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durrant, Howe, Russon, Durham, Judkins, Durrant'S, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.