Skip to main content
· 3/30/2001

McCoy v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Utah

Citations

  • 2001 UT 31
  • 20 P.3d 901
  • 418 Utah Adv. Rep. 19
  • 2001 Utah LEXIS 56
  • 2001 WL 305157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the threshold inquiry for determining whether arbitration should be enforced is direct and specific evidence of an agreement between the parties
  • affirming the denial of a motion to compel arbitration because “Blue Cross’s evidence failed to meet the minimum threshold of specificity” required under the Utah Arbitration Act to show Blue Cross provided notice of a later-added arbitration provision
  • “Where the evidence relating to a purported agreement to arbitrate is undisputed, the district court has no discretion under the statute. It must compel arbitration.”
  • setting forth a “direct and specific” evidence rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durrant, Howe, Russon, Durham, Judkins, Durrant'S, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.