Skip to main content

Snyder v. State

Citations

  • 460 N.E.2d 522
  • 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 2878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the importance of “linking] the accused with the substance in question”
  • recogniz- 7 (...continued) more than an isolated or casual instance of the prohibited activity.” 351 N.E.2d 43, 46 (Ind. Ct. App. 1976). After Wells, Indiana courts continued to require such a showing. See, e.g., Bryant v. State, 660 N.E.2d 290, 302 (Ind. 1995

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neal, Buchanan, Shields

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.