United States v. George Wuagneux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding trial court’s decision not to order a Franks hearing because the defendant failed to articulate the nature of the anticipated testimony beyond conclusory statements
• “[T]he Supreme Court has recognized that effective investigation of complex white-collar crimes may require the assembly of a ‘paper puzzle’ from a large number of seemingly innocuous pieces of individual evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).