Skip to main content

Brock v. State

Citations

  • 540 N.E.2d 1236
  • 1989 Ind. LEXIS 210
  • 1989 WL 76959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he United States Supreme Court, however, has declined to extend Bruton to situations such as this one, which do not involve facially incriminating declarations”
  • rejecting a defendant’s argument that he was prejudiced by a co-defendant’s statement because the statement did not attribute any act to the defendant
  • rejecting a defendant’s argument that he was prejudiced by a co-defendant’s statement because the statement did not attribute any act to the defendant
  • holding no Bruton violation occurred where Brock‘s co-defendant told police that they were lucky ―we‖ did not decide to resist the police with the large number of firearms present in the house and Brock and co-defendant were only two of a number of occupants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Shepard, Debruler, Givan, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.