Alaska Supreme Court· 12/27/1996
Snyder v. State
Citations
- 930 P.2d 1274
- 1996 Alas. LEXIS 158
- 1996 WL 742456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Willits-type presumption was appropriate sanction in DUI case in which state had no BAC evidence and had deprived defendant of opportunity to obtain independent blood test
- It is a fundamental tenet of due process that a person accused of a crime has a right to attempt to obtain exculpatory evidence.
- “[W]e believe that in the DWI context the accused’s right and the state’s duty extend to the opportunity to obtain an independent chemical test, and that this opportunity must be made available to the accused whether or not the accused agrees to submit to a breath test.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Compton, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Eastaugh, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-16· cited 76×
- Glamann v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-08-17· cited 56×
- Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2016-06-17· cited 43×
- McCormick v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-03-10· cited 18×
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2002-11-22· cited 16×
- Payne v. McDonald's Corp.D. Maryland· 1997-02-13· cited 15×
- Bailey v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-11-26· cited 11×
- Hartman v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court· 2007-01-26· cited 11×
- State v. GreenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-06-14· cited 8×
- Coggins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-03-03· cited 8×
- Valentine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-03-09· cited 7×
- Snyder v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-09-28· cited 5×
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-02-09· cited 5×
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-11-28· cited 4×
- State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2003-04-25· cited 4×
- McCarthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-09-07· cited 4×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-06-18· cited 2×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-05-02· cited 2×
- Trumbly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2016-09-02· cited 2×
- Selig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-09-14· cited 2×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-03-16· cited 688×
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-12-06· cited 183×
- Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 116×
- Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 104×
- Thorne v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-05-26· cited 90×
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1983-02-18· cited 74×
- Christie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-06-09· cited 68×
- State v. SwansonMontana Supreme Court· 1986-07-25· cited 65×
- Municipality of Anchorage v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-08-06· cited 65×
- Montano v. Superior Court Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-10· cited 60×
- Thessen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1969-05-12· cited 52×
- Buchanan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-03-14· cited 47×
- Briggs v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-02-20· cited 45×
- Putnam v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-12-19· cited 45×
- Arco Alaska, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-01-24· cited 42×
- Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court· 1990-06-15· cited 36×
- Paul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-11-19· cited 34×
- McMahan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-10-10· cited 32×
- March v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-10-01· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.