Glamann v. Kirk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the wage losses caused by a wife’s decision to transport her husband to his medical appointments after a car accident were not compensable in a lawsuit based on the driver’s negligence
• recognizing well-established principle that “defendant must take the victim as the defendant finds the victim and is liable for those injuries caused or aggravated by defendant’s negligence”
• arguing “defense to allegations of liability” does not shift burden of proof and plaintiff still has “burden to prove that [defendant] caused his claimed injuries”
• first citing Andrus v. Lena, 975 P.2d 54, 58 (Alaska 1999); then citing Cole v. Bartels, 4 P.3d 956, 958 (Alaska 2000)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).