Arco Alaska, Inc. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that retroactivity provision of tax statute did not require super-majority vote under art. II, § 18 based on difference between law’s effective date and retroactive application date
• stating that constitutional questions are questions of law to which the court applies its independent judgment
• upholding a tax law amendment which retroactively applied to a seven month period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).