Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 114 S.W.3d 66
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 5324
  • 2003 WL 21467740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • objection still required to preserve error for appellate review
  • objection still required to preserve error for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, Arnot, Wright, McCall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.