Gregory Pollock v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the State’s allegation that the continuous sexual abuse began on or about a certain date was sufficient to allow the defendant to prepare his defense
• holding that amended indictment alleging specific means by which defendant committed “the individual sexual abuse acts of aggravated sexual assault and sexual performance by a child” provided sufficient notice, but not holding that such specificity was constitutionally required
• holding that amended indictment alleging specific means by which defendant committed “the individual sexual abuse acts of aggravated sexual assault and sexual performance by a child” provided sufficient notice, but not holding that such specificity was constitutionally required
• noting that continuous sexual abuse of child defines “act of sexual abuse” element in several ways, including aggravated sexual assault, and that Penal Code “identifies several alternative means of committing aggravated sexual assault”
• noting that continuous sexual abuse of child defines “act of sexual abuse” element in several ways, including aggravated sexual assault, and that Penal Code “identifies several alternative means of committing aggravated sexual assault”
• holding statute does not violate constitutional right to jury unanimity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).