Supreme Court of Delaware· 10/25/2005
Smith v. State
Citations
- 887 A.2d 470
- 2005 Del. LEXIS 412
- 2005 WL 2805567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding trial court’s finding of probable cause when trial court concluded that “it rises to the level of common knowledge that imagery in computers is still in existence and is persistent”
- “We review a probable cause determination in the issuance of a search warrant with great deference, considering it as a whole and ‘not on the basis of a hypertechnical analysis of its separate allegations.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, Ridgely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-29· cited 105×
- Sisson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-06-19· cited 97×
- State v. HoldenSupreme Court of Delaware· 2013-02-05· cited 60×
- Rybicki v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-07-20· cited 30×
- Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-05-29· cited 15×
- State v. RankenSuperior Court of Delaware· 2010-10-19· cited 10×
- McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-12-18· cited 8×
- State of New Hampshire v. Robert Letoile, Jr.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-05-16· cited 5×
- State of Delaware v. Wheeler.Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-09-18
- State of Delaware v. Isaiah PalmerSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-05-03
- State v. LawSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-10-11
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2020-04-15
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-03-30
- State v. MumfordSuperior Court of Delaware· 2022-06-30
- State v. ChaffierSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-02-09
- State v. SpencerSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-04-24
- State v. HolmesSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-06-13
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1997-07-10· cited 263×
- United States v. Warren G. JohnsonTenth Circuit· 1972-06-14· cited 230×
- United States v. American Library Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 2003-06-23· cited 205×
- United States v. David Scott ZimmermanThird Circuit· 2002-01-04· cited 160×
- United States v. Alexander Montagu HayNinth Circuit· 2000-10-24· cited 131×
- United States v. Andrew M. Harvey, IIIThird Circuit· 1993-08-23· cited 123×
- Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-10-18· cited 91×
- Fink v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-02-21· cited 88×
- Woody v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-01-24· cited 84×
- Jensen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-09-11· cited 82×
- Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-07-17· cited 60×
- United States v. Daniel Chrobak, Also Known as Dan ChrobakEighth Circuit· 2002-05-07· cited 53×
- Blount v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-07-18· cited 36×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-03-28· cited 34×
- United States v. CoxN.D. New York· 2002-03-11· cited 34×
- Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-09-16· cited 29×
- People v. DonathAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-04-13· cited 25×
- Hause v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2001-10-19· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.