Supreme Court of Delaware· 2/5/2013
State v. Holden
Citations
- 60 A.3d 1110
- 2013 WL 441603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that informants’ tips that defendant was selling drugs were corroborated when officers stopped a man who was leaving the defendant’s house and discovered that he was in possession of oxycodone without a prescription
- finding that a tip from one confidential informant can support a finding of probable cause if the totality of the circumstances bolsters the tip’s reliability
- noting that the Fourth Amendment’s probable cause requirement for warrants “must be premised on the information within the four-corners of the affidavit”
- “So long as the issuing magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed, a reviewing court should not suppress the evidence seized pursuant to that warrant”
- “The magistrate issuing the warrant must make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit . . . there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
- An affidavit in support of a search warrant must, within the four corners of the affidavit, set forth facts adequate for a judicial officer to form a reasonable belief that an offense has been committed and the property to be seized will be found in a particular place
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berger, Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely, Steele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rybicki v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-07-20· cited 30×
- Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-05-29· cited 15×
- McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-12-18· cited 8×
- State of Delaware v. Clinton SharpDelaware Court of Common Pleas· 2014-05-05
- State of Delaware v. Caulk.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-09-14
- State of Delaware v. Albert.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-12-03
- State of Delaware v. Benson.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-12-17
- State of Delaware v. Carlos HernandezSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-03-29
- State v. CrippenSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-06-15
- State v. AguilarSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-08-15
- State v. FriendSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-12-13
- State v. GuardarramaSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-12-14
- State v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-12-21
- State v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-01-13
- State v. HardingSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-03-13
- State v. WhiteSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-05-08
- State v. DopirakSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-07-24
- State v. SimpsonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-08-21
- State v. MorrisSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-12-19
- State v. HaleSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-04-04
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-29· cited 105×
- Jensen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-09-11· cited 82×
- LeGrande v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-04-22· cited 65×
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-11-24· cited 48×
- Tolson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-05-18· cited 40×
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-12-05· cited 36×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-10-25· cited 23×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-09-02· cited 19×
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-08-11· cited 11×
- State v. HoldenSuperior Court of Delaware· 2010-12-14· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.