United States v. Andrew M. Harvey, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that information concerning the receipt of fifteen child pornography mailings over a period from two to fifteen months before the warrant application was made was not stale
• noting that the speed with which information supporting a warrant becomes stale varies with the nature of the crime and the type of evidence
• finding no staleness where affidavit “provided ample information that [suspect] was a pedophile”
• probable cause determination “is not merely an exercise in counting the days or even months between the facts relied on and the issuance of the warrant”
• applying 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) extraterritorially

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).