Skip to main content

Purnell v. State

Citations

  • 832 A.2d 714
  • 2003 Del. LEXIS 456
  • 2003 WL 22204114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[c]ourts will defer to the experience and training of police officers.”
  • finding that the informant was known personally by the police officer and had given reliable information in the past
  • finding that the tip was sufficiently corroborated given that the suspect “matched the description provided by the informant and was in the vicinity stated by the informant”
  • finding that officers had reasonable and articulable suspicion to conduct a Terry frisk because past-proven reliable informant supplied a tip that the suspect was armed and because of the officers’ prior experience
  • upholding a Terry search for weapons where the “informant had relayed to the officers that the men were armed”
  • “Reasonable and articulable suspicion is a less stringent standard than the probable cause standard and requires a quantum of proof that is less than preponderance of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Berger, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.