Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 7/13/1988
Holland v. State
Citations
- 761 S.W.2d 307
- 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152
- 1988 WL 71488
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \counsel was under no obligation to do what would amount to a futile act\
- holding that trial counsel is under no duty to do what would amount to a futile act
- holding that “counsel was under no obligation to do what would amount to a futile act”
- holding allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel will be sustained only if they are firmly founded in the record
- stating that “[a]bsent a showing by appellant that he would have benefitted from the testimony, the decision not to call witnesses at either stage of trial does not raise the specter of ineffective assistance.”
- stating that “[a]bsent a showing by appellant that he would have benefitted from the testimony, the decision not to call witnesses at either stage of trial does not raise the specter of ineffective assistance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Davis, Teague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
192 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-03· cited 840×
- Adanandus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-16· cited 505×
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-25· cited 484×
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-04-30· cited 439×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 418×
- Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-06· cited 343×
- Luna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-10-29· cited 267×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-13· cited 245×
- Solis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-27· cited 221×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-13· cited 216×
- Poole v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-07-30· cited 196×
- Gosch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-18· cited 190×
- Ex Parte BattleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-16· cited 190×
- Sattiewhite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-25· cited 187×
- Satterwhite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-10· cited 155×
- Woods v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1996-02-08· cited 117×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-09-20· cited 111×
- Cueva v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2011-05-02· cited 110×
- Ybarra v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1995-04-05· cited 103×
- Ex Parte TovarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-21· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.