Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 703 S.W.2d 641
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • proper questions related to the venire‘s ―idea of punishment‖ and ―what they think its purpose should be‖
  • question for jurors “thoughts” on insanity defense was not a proper question because it was improperly broad, even though it related to the defense raised in the case
  • A question may discover a juror’s view on an issue applicable to the case.
  • Court held that a question was improper when defense counsel tried to elicit jury panel’s “thoughts” and “observations” on insanity defense. Court portrayed inquiry as “so broad a question as to constitute a global fishing expedition”
  • improperly broad to ask venire members what \their thoughts\ were on insanity defense
  • improperly broad to ask venire members what “their thoughts” were on insanity defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Davis, White, Onion, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.