Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/27/1985
Smith v. State
Citations
- 703 S.W.2d 641
- 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- proper questions related to the venire‘s ―idea of punishment‖ and ―what they think its purpose should be‖
- question for jurors “thoughts” on insanity defense was not a proper question because it was improperly broad, even though it related to the defense raised in the case
- A question may discover a juror’s view on an issue applicable to the case.
- Court held that a question was improper when defense counsel tried to elicit jury panel’s “thoughts” and “observations” on insanity defense. Court portrayed inquiry as “so broad a question as to constitute a global fishing expedition”
- improperly broad to ask venire members what \their thoughts\ were on insanity defense
- improperly broad to ask venire members what “their thoughts” were on insanity defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Davis, White, Onion, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lagrone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-05· cited 911×
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-13· cited 612×
- Janecka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-27· cited 587×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-25· cited 509×
- Barajas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-06-26· cited 390×
- Ransom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-24· cited 360×
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-03· cited 297×
- Caldwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-16· cited 241×
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-05-29· cited 196×
- Guerra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-05-04· cited 193×
- Cockrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-14· cited 163×
- McCarter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-24· cited 143×
- Earhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-09-18· cited 140×
- Blackwell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-06-07· cited 139×
- Santana v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-09· cited 135×
- Atkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 125×
- Faulder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-30· cited 119×
- Easley, Damian DemitriusCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-03-12· cited 119×
- Davila v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1996-09-18· cited 118×
- Woolridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-02-26· cited 98×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-09-18· cited 203×
- McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-05· cited 193×
- De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-05-03· cited 118×
- United States v. John W. Hinckley, Jr. United States of America v. John W. Hinckley, JrD.C. Circuit· 1982-02-23· cited 106×
- Abron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-04-23· cited 98×
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-10· cited 95×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-11-26· cited 84×
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-04-08· cited 76×
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-14· cited 55×
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-01-16· cited 33×
- Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-04-05· cited 29×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-11-03· cited 25×
- Robles v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1981-12-10· cited 7×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1984-01-17· cited 6×
- Cook v. TexasSupreme Court· 1966-05-31· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.