Woolridge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant was entitled to question the venire regarding reasonable doubt
• holding that appellant was entitled to question the venire regarding reasonable doubt
• stating that in capital murder cases, trial judges have been allowed to limit individual voir dire when it appeared to be taking an unreasonable length of time
• stating that in capital murder cases, trial judges have been allowed to limit individual voir dire when it appeared to be taking an unreasonable length of time
• affirming trial judge's discretion to limit voir dire investigations into undefined terms in capital proceedings
• abuse of discretion where inquiry about burden of proof was proper, not repetitious, and not in an improper form

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).