Skip to main content

Mathis v. State

Citations

  • 576 S.W.2d 835
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court cannot prevent counsel from discussing the punishment range even where the trial court had previously told the jury it must consider the full punishment range
  • holding the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow a question to prospective jurors on their feelings against recommending probation as punishment in a murder case
  • “The right to be represented by counsel . . . encompasses the right of counsel to question the members of the jury panel in order to intelligently exercise his peremptory challenges.”
  • counsel permitted to ascertain prospective jurors' attitudes regarding minimum punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dally, Douglas, Odom, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.