Strickland v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the admissibility of breathalyzer tests is properly raised in a motion to suppress
• holding that “admissibility of test results to establish alcoholic concentration under R.C. 4511.19 turns on substantial compliance with ODH regulations”
• stating that substantial compliance is necessary before breath test results are admissible
• stating that substantial compliance is necessary before breath test results are admissible
• analyzing R.C. 4511.19(A)(3); see also City of Akron v. Wanakie Peoples, 2011-Ohio-579, ¶ 10 (9th Dist.); State v. Harding, 2006-Ohio-481, ¶ 16 (2d Dist.), citing State v. Culver, 2005-Ohio-1359 (2d Dist.) (other citation omitted); State v. Jones, 2010-Ohio-2777, ¶ 19 (8th Dist.
• the intent of Crim.R. 12 “is to determine matters before trial when possible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).