Frank v. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \An antenuptial gift of an engagement ring is the recipient's separate property.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-16· cited 44×
• Pittman v. Pittman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-01-15· cited 14×
• Wooten v. Wooten
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-05· cited 9×
• Wooten v. Wooten
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 4×
• Mosley v. Mosley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-11-10· cited 2×
• Jordan v. Postell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-08-04
• Khalil Abbas-Ghaleb v. Anna Ghaleb
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-04-03
• Khalil Abbas-Ghaleb v. Anna Ghaleb
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-10-21

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
• Phillips v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 16×
• Wyatt v. Wyatt
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-10-26· cited 10×
• Canady v. Canady
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-10-31· cited 8×
• McClerin v. McClerin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-12-07· cited 7×
• Pirkle v. Pirkle
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-12-19· cited 3×