Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 312 S.E.2d 560
  • 280 S.C. 257
  • 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wherein the Court of Appeals found the trial court abused its discretion in granting the wife exclusive possession of the marital home
  • a pension plan funded by the employer is non-marital property
  • wherein the family court was held not to have abused its discretion in awarding the wife an interest in bonds purchased by the husband from the net proceeds of funds paid in an unallocated settlement of the husband’s personal injury claim and the wife’s loss of consortium claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Shaw, Cureton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.