Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/6/1984
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 312 S.E.2d 560
- 280 S.C. 257
- 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- wherein the Court of Appeals found the trial court abused its discretion in granting the wife exclusive possession of the marital home
- a pension plan funded by the employer is non-marital property
- wherein the family court was held not to have abused its discretion in awarding the wife an interest in bonds purchased by the husband from the net proceeds of funds paid in an unallocated settlement of the husband’s personal injury claim and the wife’s loss of consortium claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Shaw, Cureton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nasser-Moghaddassi v. MoghaddassiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 37×
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-01-22· cited 30×
- Toler v. TolerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-05-11· cited 23×
- Josey v. JoseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-29· cited 22×
- Shafer v. ShaferCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-18· cited 19×
- Thompson v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-24· cited 18×
- Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 17×
- Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-07-07· cited 17×
- Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 16×
- Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-12-10· cited 16×
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-05· cited 16×
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-06-28· cited 16×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-16· cited 15×
- Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-22· cited 13×
- Brewington v. BrewingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-21· cited 12×
- Shealy v. ShealyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-21· cited 10×
- Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-07· cited 10×
- Rabon v. RabonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-05-19· cited 9×
- Hickman v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-02-22· cited 7×
- Casey v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-07-07· cited 7×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
- Lide v. LideSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-26· cited 67×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-06-19· cited 59×
- Hussey v. HusseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-01-23· cited 44×
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-02-15· cited 34×
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-06-05· cited 32×
- Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-12· cited 28×
- Parrott v. ParrottSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-05-26· cited 28×
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-05-04· cited 28×
- Whitfield v. HanksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-29· cited 21×
- Bugg v. BuggSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-05· cited 16×
- Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-06· cited 13×
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-09· cited 13×
- Mays v. MaysSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-10-28· cited 12×
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-11-11· cited 12×
- Haynes v. HaynesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-05-26· cited 10×
- Moyle v. MoyleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-04-03· cited 6×
- Grubbs v. GrubbsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-11-28· cited 6×
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-10-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.