Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/28/1976
Mays v. Mays
Citations
- 229 S.E.2d 725
- 267 S.C. 490
- 1976 S.C. LEXIS 267
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that one party to a telephone conversation may lawfully record the conversation without the other party's knowledge or consent, and subsequently disclose it
- holding 18 U.S.C.A.§ 2511(2)(d), which provides a similar exception for parties not acting under color of law, \makes it clear that one party to a telephone conversation may lawfully tape the conversation without the other's knowledge or permission and subsequently disclose it.\
- holding 18 U.S.C.A. § 2511(2)(d), which provides a similar exception for parties not acting under color of law, “makes it clear that one party to a telephone conversation may lawfully tape the conversation without the other’s knowledge or permission and subsequently disclose it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory, Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Rhodes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-08-27· cited 54×
- State v. WhitnerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-07-11· cited 40×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-06· cited 27×
- Whitfield v. HanksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-29· cited 21×
- Cudd v. ArlineSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-12-15· cited 14×
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-28· cited 14×
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-11-28· cited 14×
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-06-06· cited 10×
- Calcutt v. CalcuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-08-30· cited 8×
- State v. RuggieroSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-12-28· cited 7×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 983×
- State v. SteadmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-04-12· cited 47×
- Darden v. WithamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-10-11· cited 43×
- Martin v. DunlapSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-02-03· cited 21×
- Smith v. WunkerS.D. Ohio· 1972-04-13· cited 20×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1952-10-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.