Grubbs v. Grubbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the husband’s assertion that he did not learn of his wife’s affair until over ten years after it occurred was “insufficient to rebut the presumption of condo-nation arising from the lapse of time, the cohabitation of the parties, and other related conduct by the husband”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Atkinson v. Atkinson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1983-11-07· cited 65×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-06· cited 27×
• Doe v. Doe
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-09-10· cited 23×
• Whitfield v. Hanks
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-29· cited 21×
• Srivastava v. Srivastava
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-12-23· cited 17×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McLaughlin v. McLaughlin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-05-13· cited 33×
• Simonds v. Simonds
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-05-22· cited 25×