Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/7/1987
Hudson v. Hudson
Citations
- 363 S.E.2d 387
- 294 S.C. 166
- 1987 S.C. App. LEXIS 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the party seeking equitable distribution must present evidence supporting his or her claim
- noting the party seeking equitable distribution must present evidence supporting his or her claim
- where an issue has not been decided by the lower court, we will not consider it on appeal
- where a point has not been decided by the lower court, we will not consider it on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shaw, Sanders, Cureton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
- Cannon v. CannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-01-22· cited 15×
- Chanko v. ChankoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-07-28· cited 6×
- National Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-11-30· cited 4×
- Mason v. GossettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-21· cited 1×
- Hunt v. HuntCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-03-22· cited 1×
- Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-12-02
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Honea v. HoneaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-05-26· cited 33×
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-01-22· cited 30×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-06· cited 27×
- Odom v. County of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-05-30· cited 11×
- Timms Ex Rel. Estate of Timms v. TimmsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-07-09· cited 8×
- Boyer v. Loftin-Woodard, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-01-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.