Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 860 P.2d 634
  • 124 Idaho 431
  • 1993 Ida. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Expenditures made and in debtedness incurred during the marriage are presumed to be for the benefit of the community unless the spouse alleging dissipation can demonstrate that the dissipating spouse spent community funds on something other than the community.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trout, McDevitt, Johnson, Meehl, Bistline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.