Idaho Supreme Court· 11/30/1988

Shill v. Shill

Citations

765 P.2d 140
115 Idaho 115
1988 Ida. LEXIS 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court impermissibly awarded increases in pension benefits accruing after divorce since such benefits are not “acquired during the marriage” and hence are separate
holding that the trial court impermissibly awarded increases in pension benefits accruing after divorce since such benefits are not \acquired during the marriage\ and hence are separate
recognizing the issue presented in Ruggles and Mick, but declining to rule on it
“such solution would have the merit of disentangling the parties and their affairs at a finite point in time”
\such solution would have the merit of disentangling the parties and their affairs at a finite point in time\
both cases evaluate salary increases in the context of valuation of retirement plan benefits for the purpose of determining the community interest and characterize the increases as the separate property of the employee-spouse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Bistline, Huntley, Bakes, McQuade, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.