Skip to main content
· 1/11/1994

Mulch v. Mulch

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 967
  • 125 Idaho 93
  • 1994 Ida. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting substantial, competent evidence supported finding that spouse “could earn additional wages from overtime work” in future
  • noting substantial, competent evidence supported finding that spouse “could earn additional wages from overtime work” in future
  • affirming an order of spousal maintenance based upon implicit findings by the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, McDevitt, Bistline, Trout, Silak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.