Hoskinson v. Hoskinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the baseline presumption under Idaho state law is that “property acquired after marriage is community property”
• noting with approval trial court’s determination that spouse seeking maintenance was “voluntarily 14 underemployed” and estimating her income for purposes of evaluating whether to award spousal maintenance based on “what she was capable of earning”
• noting with approval trial court’s determination that spouse seeking maintenance was “voluntarily 14 underemployed” and estimating her income for purposes of evaluating whether to award spousal maintenance based on “what she was capable of earning”
• “[T]he natural enhancement of a separate property asset due to market trends, inflation, etc., and which is not attributable to community efforts or to rents and profits of the assets, is separate property.” (quoting Mifflin v. Mifflin, 97 Idaho 895, 896, 556 P.2d 854, 855 (1976))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).