· 2/28/2000
Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.
Citations
- 996 P.2d 303
- 134 Idaho 84
- 2000 Ida. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expert testimony on proximate cause is required when the issue is not one that lay persons are competent to make
- expert testimony on proximate cause is required when the issue is not one that lay persons are competent to make
- expert testimony on causation in legal malpractice case is required when factors involved are not within ordinary knowledge and experience of laypersons
- expert testimony on proximate cause is required when the issue is not one that lay persons are competent to make
- a party is required to “provide affidavits of expert witnesses to resist the motion” for summary judgment
- a party is required to “provide affidavits of expert witnesses to resist the motion” for summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kidwell, Trout, Silak, Schroeder, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.