Skip to main content
· 2/28/2000

Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.

Citations

  • 996 P.2d 303
  • 134 Idaho 84
  • 2000 Ida. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expert testimony on proximate cause is required when the issue is not one that lay persons are competent to make
  • expert testimony on proximate cause is required when the issue is not one that lay persons are competent to make
  • expert testimony on causation in legal malpractice case is required when factors involved are not within ordinary knowledge and experience of laypersons
  • expert testimony on proximate cause is required when the issue is not one that lay persons are competent to make
  • a party is required to “provide affidavits of expert witnesses to resist the motion” for summary judgment
  • a party is required to “provide affidavits of expert witnesses to resist the motion” for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kidwell, Trout, Silak, Schroeder, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.