Third Circuit· 6/11/2002

Smith v. Mensinger

Citations

293 F.3d 641
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 11678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that placement in disciplinary confinement for seven (7) months “does not, on its own, violate a protected liberty interest as defined in Sandin”
concluding that seven months of disciplinary confinement “does not, on its own, violate a protected liberty interest as defined in Sandin
concluding that seven months of disciplinary confinement “does not, on its own, violate a protected liberty interest”
holding that placement in disciplinary confinement for seven (7) months “does not, on its own, violate a protected liberty interest as defined in Sandin”
concluding that a prisoner’s seven (7) month placement in disciplinary confinement “does not, on its own, violate a protected liberty interest as defined in Sandin”
holding that placement in disciplinary confinement for seven (7) months “does not, on its own, violate a protected liberty interest as defined in Sandin”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.