Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 1/7/1999

Thomas v. Roach

Citations

  • 165 F.3d 137
  • 1999 WL 5310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that summary judgment was appropriate in case where the plaintiff’s claims on the existence of an agreement were conclusory and vague
  • finding that although plaintiff “who is black, is a member of a protected class,” such assertion is insufficient to “demonstrate that the officers selected their course of action because of his race.”
  • no need to consider an argument that is raised for the first time in the reply brief
  • “The Fourth Amendment protects against the use of excessive force by police officers in carrying out an arrest.”
  • “Section 1983 itself creates no substantive rights; it provides only a procedure for redress for the deprivation of rights established elsewhere.”
  • “Section 1983 itself creates no substantive rights; it provides only a procedure for redress for the deprivation of rights established elsewhere.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cote, Oakes, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.