Nicholson v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because petitioner’s only sanction was “confine[ment] to administrative segregation for 15 days . . . his sole claim fail[ed] to assert an issue cognizable on federal habeas review”
• “[A] challenge to a disciplinary hearing that resulted in the imposition of discipline other than the loss of good-time credit does not allege a proper ground for habeas relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).