McKinzey v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that error is harmless only if the Court is “convinced” that ALJ would reach same result on remand
• affirming ALJ’s credibility determination even though two of plaintiff’s three challenges had merit
• it is a waste of time to remand when the court is convinced that the ALJ would reach the same result
• “the ALJ must explain [his] decision in such a way that allows us to determine whether [he] reached [his] decision in a rational manner, logically based on [his] specific findings and the evidence in the record.”
• credibility determinations must be supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).