Fourthman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly permitted conservation officer to act as assisting witness because he was an officer of a state agency and was one of the primary investigating officers
• exempting a law enforcement officer to assist in the prosecution of a case under Rule 615(2) “even though the officer may also be called to testify as a witness”
• exempting a law enforcement officer to assist in the prosecution of a case under Rule 615(2) \even though the officer may also be called to testify as a witness\
• investigating officer was permitted to remain in the courtroom under the exception set forth in Indiana Evidence Rule 615(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).