Sisk v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that admission of an affidavit denied defendant the right to confront and cross-examine a witness
• conviction reversed where introduction of search warrant and affidavit \allowed the state to get into evidence hearsay statements which deprived appellant of the right of confrontation and cross examination\
• “We think that this clearly demonstrates the reason why the legality of the search is and should be a matter of law to be determined by the court and not one for the jury to decide.”
• “We think that this clearly demonstrates the reason why the legality of the search is and should be a matter of law to be determined by the court and not one for the jury to decide.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).