People v. Hebel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no legitimate privacy expectation in allegedly lewd photographs seized from photo processing store
• applying these six factors in determining that a search warrant was supported by probable cause to believe photographs in the defendant's possession constituted evidence of child pornography
• finding the evidence for sexual penetration sufficient where it showed that the defendant touched the “inner surface of the victim’s labium majora and her labium minora”
• the victim’s father and stepmother identified the child in photographs of the child’s vagina and buttocks, by reference to moles, freckles, or brown spots on the child’s right buttock and right thigh
• the State does not have to show any penetration of, or even contact with, a woman's vagina, since under the statute a woman's \sex organ\ includes all of her genitalia
• the victim's father and stepmother identified the child in photographs of the child's vagina and buttocks, by reference to moles, freckles, or brown spots on the child's right 22 buttock and right thigh

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).