Ninth Circuit· 5/3/2011

Singh v. Holder

Citations

638 F.3d 1264
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8973
2011 WL 1643244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that presentation of fraudulent documents when a petitioner was safely in the United States sufficed to support an adverse credibility finding
holding that substantial evidence supported adverse credibility determination and explaining that “lies and fraudulent documents when they are no longer necessary for the immediate escape from persecution do support an adverse inference”
concluding that there was no abuse of discretion in denying a second continuance
explaining that “lies and fraudulent documents when they are [not] necessary for the immediate escape from persecution do support an adverse [credibility] inference”
explaining that “lies and fraudulent documents when they are no longer necessary for the immediate escape from persecution do support an adverse inference”
noting that an IJ is “not required to grant a continuance based on . . . speculation[ ]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, O'Scannlain, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Singh v. Holder

224 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.