Ninth Circuit· 12/31/2013
Li v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Citations
- 738 F.3d 1160
- 2013 WL 6851028
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, in the immigration context, the fact-finder may \disbelieve a witness’s entire testimony if the witness makes a material and conscious falsehood in one aspect of [her] testimony\ (emphases omitted)
- noting that “when and why [petitioner] applied for a passport are central to determining whether she suffered religious persecution”
- stating that inconsistencies about an applicant’s religious background “strike at the heart” of a religious persecution claim
- noting that “when and why [the petitioner] applied for a passport are central to determining whether she suffered religious persecution”
- finding that application of the maxim falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus is appropriate in evaluating witness testimony in immigration cases
- explaining that the IJ and BIA may “disbelieve a witness’s entire testimony if the witness makes a material and conscious falsehood in one aspect of his testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Bea, Christen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Youssif Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLCNinth Circuit· 2023-12-21· cited 66×
- United States v. Ahmad McAdoryNinth Circuit· 2019-08-28· cited 64×
- Shouchen Yang v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2016-05-19· cited 40×
- Kami Etemadi v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-09-09· cited 16×
- Thomas Creech v. Josh TewaltNinth Circuit· 2023-10-13· cited 16×
- Keith Ford v. Suzanne PeeryNinth Circuit· 2021-06-08· cited 12×
- United States v. Seraphina CharleyNinth Circuit· 2021-06-11· cited 12×
- Marcia Stein v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2024-09-24· cited 7×
- Bank of Manhattan, N.A. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceNinth Circuit· 2015-03-04· cited 4×
- Singh v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-12-24· cited 4×
- Ming Dai v. William P. BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-10-22· cited 3×
- Shouchen Yang v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2016-02-26
- Paz v. SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-08-14
- Ani v. BondiNinth Circuit· 2025-10-16
- American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. TrumpNinth Circuit· 2026-01-05
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Victor Paul v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesSecond Circuit· 2006-04-06· cited 3,481×
- Shrestha v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-01-05· cited 1,845×
- Felix Norbert Siewe v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralSecond Circuit· 2007-03-13· cited 994×
- Baljinder Singh SANGHA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentNinth Circuit· 1997-01-09· cited 716×
- Jian Lian Guo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2004-10-25· cited 644×
- Xiaoguang Gu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-07-21· cited 582×
- Rajinder Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-03-10· cited 523×
- United States v. Michael JohnsonNinth Circuit· 2001-07-20· cited 403×
- Mustafe Muse Jibril v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-09-19· cited 212×
- Samer Mansour v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSeventh Circuit· 2000-10-16· cited 206×
- Mercedes Vilorio-Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1988-10-03· cited 196×
- Singh v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-05-03· cited 135×
- Everth Aroldo Ceballos-Castillo, and Santos Pineda-Medrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1990-06-01· cited 125×
- Rosalina Lopez-Umanzor v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-05-06· cited 109×
- Kadia v. GonzalesSeventh Circuit· 2007-09-07· cited 105×
- Nasser Mustapha Karouni v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-03-07· cited 104×
- Rakesh Maini Jasmail Mainivikram Maini Arjum Maini,petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,opinionNinth Circuit· 2000-05-19· cited 81×
- Aster Worku Gebreeyesus v. Alberto R. GonzalesSeventh Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 40×
- Lozano Enterprises v. National Labor Relations BoardNinth Circuit· 1964-03-24· cited 33×
- United States v. William D. Schimmel, A/K/A Billy D. SchimmelSeventh Circuit· 1991-09-26· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.