Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 12/31/2013

Li v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Citations

  • 738 F.3d 1160
  • 2013 WL 6851028
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in the immigration context, the fact-finder may \disbelieve a witness’s entire testimony if the witness makes a material and conscious falsehood in one aspect of [her] testimony\ (emphases omitted)
  • noting that “when and why [petitioner] applied for a passport are central to determining whether she suffered religious persecution”
  • stating that inconsistencies about an applicant’s religious background “strike at the heart” of a religious persecution claim
  • noting that “when and why [the petitioner] applied for a passport are central to determining whether she suffered religious persecution”
  • finding that application of the maxim falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus is appropriate in evaluating witness testimony in immigration cases
  • explaining that the IJ and BIA may “disbelieve a witness’s entire testimony if the witness makes a material and conscious falsehood in one aspect of his testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Bea, Christen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.