Skip to main content
· 5/22/2008

Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 526 F.3d 1243
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10884
  • 2008 WL 2131299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for a continuance where the relief sought was not immediately available to petitioner
  • no abuse of discretion in denying a motion to continue and ordering petitioner removed where relief was not immediately available
  • the denial of a continuance was within the agency’s discretion where relief was not immediately available to petitioner
  • IJ’s denial of an additional continuance was within discretion where relief was not immediately available to petitioner
  • denial of a motion to continue was not an abuse of discretion where proceedings had previously been continued and relief was not immediately available to petitioner
  • denial of a motion to continue was not an abuse of discretion where proceedings had previously been continued and relief was not immediately available to petitioner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alfred T. Goodwin, B. Fletcher, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.