William Jefferson & Co., Inc. v. Board of Assessment and Appeal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Salerno to a facial procedural due process challenge under the Fourteenth Amendment
• rejecting the plaintiff’s arguments because “even if there 4 were some evidence that [the Board’s legal advisor] was biased . . . that evidence might not be 5 sufficient to conclude that the adjudicating body—the Board itself—was biased”
• “[A] facial challenge to a statute necessarily fails if an as-applied challenge has failed because the plaintiff must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).