Skip to main content

Sinclair v. State

Citations

  • 995 So. 2d 552
  • 2008 WL 4057841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \marijuana identification by nonscientific means is a settled issue in Florida law\
  • holding that identification of cocaine by the arresting officer at probation violation hearing is sufficient for revocation where the officer worked street level narcotics and handled cocaine daily, even though the State did not produce a written lab report
  • holding drug identification by the arresting officer at a probation violation hearing was sufficient to revoke probation, even though the State did not introduce a lab report
  • “We hold that a sufficiently experienced officer may opine regarding the identity of crack cocaine.”
  • “[A] sufficiently experienced officer may opine regarding the identity of crack cocaine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gersten, C.J., and Shepherd and Cortiã‘as

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.